80 Ohio App. 3d 502 - In Re Smith’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]he juvenile court was entitled to review the appropriateness of filing the complaint * * * during the initial intake of the juvenile into the juvenile court system, while keeping in mind that formal action before the juvenile court should be a last resort in dealing with juvenile problems”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In Re Brant, Unpublished Decision (12-9-2005)

2. “Had we been sitting as the juvenile court, we would have been inclined to approve the recommendation of the referee that a preliminary hearing be held to determine whether the matter should proceed on the charge of rape or be diverted for treatment or amended to a more appropriate charge”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In Re R.H., 22352 (2-22-2008)

3. “in light of In re M.D., [concluded that] the referee had not erred in recommending that a pretrial hearing be held where the state would have the opportunity to establish the reasonableness of the filing consistent with public policy and to rebut the presumption of incapability.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In the Matter of Arnett, Unpublished Decision (11-1-2004)