Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Ohio App. 3d 510 - State v. Lamm

80 Ohio App. 3d 510 - State v. Lamm’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2023

3 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

1101992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · City of Columbus v. Fraley · State v. Hoffman · Hoover v. Garfield Heights Municipal Court · City of Cincinnati v. Karlan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] person may not be punished for speaking boisterous, rude or insulting words, even with the intent to annoy another, unless the words by their very utterance inflict injury or are likely to provoke the average person to an immediate retaliatory breach of the peace.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.