Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Ohio App. 3d 576 - Vanke v. Vanke

80 Ohio App. 3d 576 - Vanke v. Vanke’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories · Kunkle v. Kunkle · Ostrander v. Parker-Fallis Insulation Co. · 9 Ohio App. 3d 191 - Bingham v. Bingham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Except in cases involving a marriage of long duration, parties of advanced age or a homemaker-spouse with little opportunity to develop meaningful employment outside the home, where a payee spouse has the resources, ability and potential to be self-supporting, an award of sustenance alimony should provide for the termination of the award, within a reasonable time and upon a date certain, in order to place a definitive limit upon the parties’ rights and responsibilities.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * Using Kunkle as a guideline, if the trial court concludes that the appellee’s situation does not comport with the Kunkle excéptions and that she has the resources, ability, and potential to become self-supporting, then the trial court may consider a termination date for the spousal support in light of the changed circumstances.” Id., 80 Ohio App.3d at 581 , 609 N.E.2d at 1331 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.