Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Ohio App. 3d 765 - State v. Acoff

80 Ohio App. 3d 765 - State v. Acoff’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Bradley · State v. Stewart · State v. Kelley · State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen the trial court substantially complies with Crim.R. 11(C), the sentence that it imposes is within its discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.