Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 OHIOST3D 659 - VanBuskirk v. Wingard

VanBuskirk v. Wingard’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently October 2024

23 state decisions

1101998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Beaucamp v. Lazaroff · State ex rel. Justice v. McMackin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a grand jury foreperson's failure to sign an indictment does not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction or otherwise entitle a criminal defendant convicted and sentenced on the indictment to a writ of habeas corpus.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.