80 Okla. Crim. 230 - State v. Waldrep’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 1977
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 28 Okla. Crim. 234 - State v. Robertson · 54 Okla. Crim. 431 - Hicks v. State · 72 Okla. Crim. 165 - Glenn v. State · 15 Okla. Crim. 187 - State v. Vaughn · 71 Okla. Crim. 339 - Ray v. Stevenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In a criminal case the State may appeal to this court: First, from a judgment setting aside an indict ment or information; second, upon an order .of court arresting judgment; and, third, upon a question, reserved by the State. An appeal upon a question reserved by the State does not bring up any part of the trial or proceedings of the case, except the question reserved..and the judgment of acquittal, and if such question reserved is decided in favor of the State, it simply settles that question of law and does not affect the verdict of acquittal.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““If the demurrer is sustained, the judgment is final upon the indictment or information demurred to, and is a bar to another prosecution for the same offense, unless the court, being of opinion that .the objection on which the demurrer is sustained may be avoided in a new indictment or information, direct the case to be resubmitted to the same or another grand jury, or that a new information be filed.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““In a criminal case the state may appeal to this court: First, from a judgment setting aside an indictment or information; second, upon an order of court arresting judgment; and, third, -upon a question reserved by the state. Where the judgment quashing or setting aside the information contains an order discharging the defendant, the' appeal from the judgment is upon a question reserved by the state, for the reason that the defendant has been discharged and cannot be compelled to respond to any further orders in the proceeding, .when so discharged the case as to him is at an end. The appeal then is on a naked question of law. But if the defendant be not ordered discharged, he must abide the further, orders of this court on appeal, as well as any subsequent proceedings in the case in the trial court.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hollis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.