Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Okla. Crim. 86 - Fowler v. State

80 Okla. Crim. 86 - Fowler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
September 1954
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 53 Okla. Crim. 383 - Gee v. State · 44 Okla. Crim. 189 - Robinson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As to whether the liquid seized on that occasion was whisky as alleged in the information, the proof could be made by circumstantial as well as by direct evidence. The fact that the liquid was in a pint bottle with an unbroken Government seal, that is was red in color and had the appearance of whisky and it was labelled ‘whisky’ was a sufficient showing that the liquor transported by the defendant was whisky, and in the absence of any proof offered on behalf of defendant, was sufficient to sustain the conviction.” ■”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.