¶1 dissenting. I concur in sustaining the demurrer of Berkeley County, but the other defendants did not demur, and I do not think the Court should, of its own motion, dismiss the action as to them.
80 S.C. 32
61 S.E 203
Heape v. Berkeley County
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 14, 1908
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1908-04-14
Before Gary, J., Berkeley; November, 1906. Action by Emma A. Heape against Berkeley County, Joe R. Brown, Nathan Taylor, J. H. Harvey and Daniel T. Baxter. From order sustaining demurrer, plaintiff appeals. cites: There is a distinction between duties of county officers which are of a general governmental character and those which affect particular interests: 2 Dill.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1908-04-14
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1985
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →