Cuka v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
2 district · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably Hurley v. State (1966), G. H. Lindekugel & Sons, Inc. v. S. D. State Highway Commission (1972)
2 district · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griffis v. State · Edmison v. Lowry · Griffis v. State · Kansas City Bridge Co. v. State · Sigwald v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In effect, plaintiff is asking for damages for breach of contract. As such his claim must be denied as there are no appropriated highway funds available to pay the same.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an easement was all the state could acquire regardless of the form of the instrument of conveyance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“land or lands, easement in same or material”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hurley v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.