State v. Reddington’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 71 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently August 2010 · most notably State Highway Commission v. Hayes Estate (1966), Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc. (1994)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 71 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 53 Cal. 2d 160 - People v. Atchley · Poe v. Ullman · 27 Wash. 2d 336 - State v. Britton · Smith v. Smith · Atchley v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[p]rejudicial error is such error as in all probability must have produced some effect upon the final result of the trial,'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Beene · Campbell v. State“[A] new trial should not be granted unless it is reasonably clear that the substantial rights of the defendant have been so violated that he did not receive a fair trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Branch · State v. Webb“"There is no definite rule by which to measure prejudicial error and each case must be decided on its own facts.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Branch · State v. Myers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.