State v. Blue Fox Bar, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
April 1989
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sinnott · State v. Belt · State v. Wood · State v. Burchard · State v. Carlisle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The test of the sufficiency of an information under these provisions is whether it apprises a defendant with reasonable certainty of the nature of the accusation against him so that he may prepare his defense and plead the judgment as a bar to any subsequent prosecution for the same offense. State v. Sinnott, 72 S.D. 100 , 30 N.W.2d 455 ; State v. Wood, 77 S.D. 120 , 86 N.W.2d 530 ; State v. Belt, 79 S.D. 324 , 111 N.W.2d 588 .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bullis · State v. Myers“(1) The party charged; (2) The offense charged; (3) The name of the thing or person upon or against whom the offense was committed.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bullis · State v. Myers“"Defendant contends the trial court erred in not granting its motion to quash the information and in not sustaining objection to the introduction of evidence thereunder for the reason the name of the person, or persons, upon or against whom the alleged offenses were committed were not set forth or otherwise identified with reasonable certainty. We agree."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.