80 SO2D 918 - Galatis v. Plasman

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1988

3 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed.

TERRELL, SEBRING, MATHEWS, DREW, and BUFORD, JJ., concur.ROBERTS, C. J., and HOBSON, J., dissent.HOBSON, Justice

¶2(dissenting).

¶3I would reverse the final decree and follow the recommendations of the special master, who personally heard the several witnesses, except that part of the final decree wherein the chancellor found that the estate of Julia Galatis is “entitled to receive the undrawn salaries which had accrued to her at the time of her death, in the amount of $13,054.92 together with the sum of $11,510.73 found by the master to be due the estate of Julia Galatis … »

¶4ROBERTS, C. J., concurs.