Wexler v. Rich’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 780 So. 2d 45 - Beal Bank, SSB v. Almand and Associates · 257 So. 2d 530 - Posner v. Posner · 330 So. 2d 171 - MANUFACTURERS'LEAS., LTD. v. Florida Dev. & Att., Inc. · Sitomer v. Orlan · Wiggins v. Parson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Bing Kearney testified that, knowing the IRS check was coming, his lawyers advised him to put the check in a “tenants by the entireties” (“T/E”) account. (Dkt. 363, p. 46); 2. Bing Kearney testified that he went to the branch of USAmeribank on Whiting Street, and told them he wanted to open a T/E account. He signed the signature card and then took it with him for Tonya Kearney and Chase Kearney to sign. (Dkt. 363, p. 47), (Ex. 5 at hearing); 3. When Bing Kearney brought the signature card back, he was told that there can’t be three people on a T/E account, and another signature card with the same account number was filled out. (Dkt. 363, p. 51), (Ex. 6 at hearing); 4. Tonya Kearney came in to the bank to sign the signature card. (Dkt. 363, p. 53); 5. The box for “Multiple-Party Account” was checked. The box for “Multiple Party Account-Tenancy by the En-tireties” was not checked. When asked whether he observed that at the time he signed the signature card, Bing Kearney testified that he did not have, his glasses on, so he signed where the [bank representative] put the X. “Said sign here. I cannot read without these glasses.” (Dkt. 363, p. 54); 6. When asked whether he said anything to the lady he was dealing with at the bank, Bing Kearney testified: ‘Tes, it was to be a tenants by the entireties account. I clearly knew I needed an account tenants by the entirety.” (Dkt. 363, p. 54); 7. The box for “Multiple Parties Account With Right of Survivorship” is checked. When asked ”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.