80 So. 3d 1288 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 843 So. 2d 641 - Bankers Ins. Co. v. State · State v. Adkins · 499 So. 2d 1275 - State v. Wheeler · 688 So. 2d 191 - State v. Polk · 977 So. 2d 154 - State v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Summary proceedings. The defendant and his sureties shall be entitled to bring defenses and actions in nullity by use of summary proceedings in the criminal matter before the trial court which issued the judgment of bond forfeiture within sixty days from mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture.... The defendant and his sureties shall be entitled to bring defenses pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 345 and R.S. 15:87 by use of summary proceedings in the criminal matter before the trial court which issued the judgment of bond forfeiture within six months from mailing the notice of the signing of the judgment of bond forfeiture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The purpose of the bond forfeiture statute, La. R.S. 15:85, 'is to shield the surety from prejudice brought about by the delay in learning of the defendant's failure to appear.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mosk
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.