80 So. 3d 639 - State v. Clofer’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Oliveaux · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · State Ex Rel. Roland v. State · 712 So. 2d 485 - State v. Fernandez · 857 So. 2d 1153 - State v. Terrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“| ^Before introducing a defendant’s incul-patory statement made during a custodial interrogation, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was first advised of his Miranda rights, and that the statement was made “freely and voluntarily, and not under the influence of fear, intimidation, menaces, threats, inducement or promises.” State v. Rose, 05-770, p. 9 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/27/06), 924 So.2d 1107, 1111 , writ denied, 06-1286 (La.11/22/06), 942 So.2d 554 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.