Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 SW3D 184 - Scott v. State

Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Douglas v. People of State of California · Wisconsin v. Yoder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not relieve an individual of the obligation to comply with a valid and neutral law of general applicability on the ground that the law proscribes (or prescribes) conduct that his religion prescribes (or proscribes)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re RM

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.