Herrera v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 337th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Sharpe · Ohio v. Robinette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. The proximity of the consent to the illegal police conduct and what occurred in that time period. 2. Whether the illegal conduct brought about police observation of the particular object which they sought consent to search. 3. Whether the illegal conduct was “flagrant police misconduct.” 4. Whether the consent was volunteered rather than requested by the detaining officers. 5. Whether the arrestee was made fully aware of the fact that he could decline to consent and thus prevent an immediate search. 6. Whether the police purpose underlying the illegal conduct was to obtain the consent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Joubert v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.