In re Consolidated Rendering Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1907
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 1991 · most notably Orr v. Orr (1962), State v. McElreavy (1991)
2 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Edwin Hale v. William Henkel · Hurtado v. People of the State of California · Hagar v. · Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage Commissioners · Chicago Burlington Quincy Railway Company v. People of the State of Illinois I O Grimwood F L
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The office of the writ of subpoena duces tecum extends only to compel the bringing into court by a party or witness of books and papers of which he has control, and an inspection of which is deemed to be essential to the proper determination of the issues presented for trial. The writ has no effect upon the question of the admissibility of books and papers so brought in as evidence in the case.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lavallee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.