Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Wash. 2d 47 - State v. Stiltner

80 Wash. 2d 47 - State v. Stiltner’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
3
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably 101 Wash. 2d 664 - State v. Rupe (1984), 108 Wash. 2d 734 - State v. Rupe (1987)

51 state decisions

21019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sheppard v. Maxwell · Estes v. Texas · 79 Wash. 2d 512 - State v. Randecker · 49 Wash. 2d 66 - State v. Case · 77 Wash. 2d 503 - State v. Parnell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “absent a convincing showing of an abuse of discretion.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] denial of due process in cases involving the publicity of criminal matters may be found even without an affirmative showing of actual prejudice. Indeed, where the circumstances involve a probability that prejudice will result, it is to be deemed inherently lacking in due process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]rial courts must recognize this court's commitment to the principle that the right to a trial by jury includes the right to an unbiased and unprejudiced jury, and that a trial by jury, one or more of whose members is biased or prejudiced, is not a constitutional trial. . . . We have had occasion to predicate error upon the refusal of a trial court to grant a motion for change of venue where we could not escape the conclusion that such was necessary to effectuate the defendant's guarantee of a fair and impartial trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.