Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Wash. 2d 531 - Johnson v. Moore

80 Wash. 2d 531 - Johnson v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2020
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2020

7 state decisions

40197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fallen v. United States · Escalera v. New York City Housing Authority · Williams v. City of Wichita · Carr v. Conoco Plastics, Inc. · Weiss v. Tenney Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A class action injunction proceeding, [as distinguished from a habeas corpus action], places in issue only the constitutionality of the presumably unvarying standards applied in holding members of the class "on suspicion" of various charges without bringing them before a magistrate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A class action is therefore appropriate, since there are issues of law common to all members of the class as required by CR 23(a)(2), and the respondent has "acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class." CR 23(b)(2).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to put the court in a position to render broad remedial relief for allegedly unconstitutional action by means of declaratory judgment or injunction ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.