Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 Wash. 2d 808 - State v. Bowen

80 Wash. 2d 808 - State v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 2004

17 state decisions

801972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 68 Wash. 2d 748 - State v. Russell · 77 Wash. 2d 630 - State v. Coffey · 69 Wash. 2d 588 - Peterson v. Eritsland · 73 Wash. 2d 141 - State v. Schimschal · 69 Wash. 2d 107 - State v. Kline

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not signify a legislative intent that a putative father should escape liability for child support if a filiation proceeding is not instituted within the 2-year period, inasmuch as there is no similar limitation upon the time within which the prosecutor can bring an action to enforce support under RCW 26.20 [criminal nonsupport].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Filiation proceedings are not the only method by which a putative unmarried father may be made responsible for the support of his children. This may be proven in every cause where pertinent regardless of the existence of the filiation statutes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “does not expire at the end of the second year of a child’s fife simply because his mother has failed to bring an action to establish the identity of his father.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.