80 Wash. App. 184 - State v. Mitzlaff’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2019
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chimel v. California · New York v. Belton · Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n · Hernandez v. United States · 97 Wash. 2d 92 - State v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Fourth Amendment limits the permissible scope of a warrantless search incident to arrest to the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, i.e., places from which the individual might obtain a weapon or destroy incriminating evidence.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bonds · State v. Jordan“is not accessible without exiting the vehicle”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnston
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.