State v. Rivard’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 116 Wash. 2d 154 - State v. Schulze · 82 Wash. 2d 865 - State v. Wetherell · 79 Wash. 2d 500 - Connolly v. Department of Motor Vehicles · 94 Wash. 2d 820 - State v. Turpin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n officer must inform a suspect of `his or her right to have additional tests administered by any qualified person of his or her choosing....' RCW 46.20.308(2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rivard“he must have refused knowingly and intelligently, after being advised of his right to have a physician....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Rivard“should not lose ... [the implied consent warning] right because he cooperated and was not arrested”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Rivard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.