80 Wash. App. 684 - State v. Ozuna’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · 107 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Kennedy · Mobil Oil Corp. v. Lightcap · 110 Wash. 2d 454 - City of Seattle v. Mesiani · 121 Wash. 2d 168 - State v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even if the officers reasonably believe that items seen inside a vehicle are stolen . . . there must be exigent circumstances making it impractical to obtain a search warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Swetz“faced with `emergent or exigent circumstances regarding the security and acquisition of incriminating evidence' that made it impracticable to obtain a warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Swetz“Even if we had found probable cause here, the warrantless search was unlawful because no exigencies existed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barnes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.