Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 80 WASHAPP 795 - State v. Farmer

State v. Farmer’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1998
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Maryland · United States v. Miller · 106 Wash. 2d 54 - State v. Gunwall · Poythress v. Duncan · 115 Wash. 2d 571 - State v. Boland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and reflected nothing regarding the purchase of power tools or a heater. Zerby next contacted U.S. Micro Express, where the Farmers claimed to have purchased a printer on March 8, 1993. The store's copy of the receipt was dated August 20, 1992, long before the January 1993 leak. The garbage collector who picked up trash at the Farmers' house told the sheriff's department that the Farmers had one”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “and cleaned up the water themselves. In response to Leishman's request, Mrs. Farmer sent Jedlicka a list of damaged items. Among the damaged items listed were 67 yards of carpet, a computer monitor, a compact disc player, a receiver, a dual cassette deck, a printer, a Persian rug, a rotary saw, a space heater, two barstools, two speakers, a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the Farmers would receive if they paid their bill on time. The store's copy of the receipt for the Milwaukee Hole Hawg, the heater, and the rotary saw was dated December 10, 1992, rather than February 1, 1993 as was the Farmers' copy. The store's copy mentioned only the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.