80 Wis. 2d 305 - State v. Avery’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 2010 · most notably 102 Wash. 2d 348 - State v. Calderon (1984), 92 Wis. 2d 685 - Fredrick v. City of Janesville (1979)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 74 Wis. 2d 675 - State v. Becker · 68 Wis. 2d 26 - Barneveld State Bank v. Petersen · 348 F. Supp. 764 - Miller v. Quatsoe · Atkinson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the state, without prejudice to its investigation, could have commenced proceedings in this case earlier than March 11, it may well be that the defendant was prejudiced by the state’s failure to do so. Even if there was no manipulative intent, a negligent failure to bring the charge promptly would have deprived the defendant of her opportunity to oppose a waiver of juvenile jurisdiction. Therefore, this case must be remanded with direc tions to hold an evidentiary due-process hearing for the purpose of determining whether, in bringing the charge against the defendant, the prosecutor acted with due dispatch after the investigation was concluded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“states that the date of commencing the action, rather than the date of the alleged criminal action, is what determines whether or not there is juvenile jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.