Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 800 A2D 327 - Commonwealth v. Tyson

Commonwealth v. Tyson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Nixon · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button · Branzburg v. Hayes · Swansboro Country, Inc. v. Lumberman's Mortgage Co. · Jaffee Special Administrator for Allen Deceased v. Redmond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general rule, individuals possess no “constitutional [] immunity] from ... subpoenas” and other requests for pre-trial discovery. Parties to both civil litigation and criminal trials have an important interest in obtaining “every man’s evidence” and when called upon, citizens must provide whatever information they are “capable of giving.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.