Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 800 A2D 420 - State v. Aponte

State v. Aponte’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berkemer v. McCarty · Oregon v. Mathiason · State v. Tempest · State v. Bryant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n appropriate circumstances, we will exercise our prerogative to affirm a determination of a trial justice on grounds different from those enunciated in his or her decision.”) (internal quotation marks omitted). 10 . See, e.g., Martin v. Lilly, 505 A.2d 1156, 1161 (R.I.1986) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.