Com. v. JF’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Williams · 265 Pa. Super. 194 - Commonwealth v. Stanley · Commonwealth v. Gaitling · Commonwealth v. Begley · 2001 Pa. Super. 197 - Commonwealth v. Davalos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may allow an information to be amended when there is a defect in form, the description of the offense(s), the description of any person or any property, or the date charged, provided the information as amended does not charge an additional or different offense. Upon amendment, the court may grant such postponement of trial or other relief as necessary in the interests of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[Wjhether the crimes specified in the original indictment or information involve the same basic elements and evolved out of the same factual situation as the crimes specified in the amended indictment or information. If so, then the defendant is deemed to have been placed on notice regarding his alleged criminal conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.