Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 800 F.2d 136 - Thronson v. Meisels

Thronson v. Meisels’s Empirical Analysis

800 F.2d 136 · 1986

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably 10 Cal. 4th 698 - In Re MS (1995), United States v. Kelly (2000)

24 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1901986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Newman Oil Co. · United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Florida v. Royer · Coughlin v. Capitol Cement Co. · United States v. McRae

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury____””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to whether there was any evidence to support the jury's verdict, irrespective of its sufficiency, or whether plain error was committed which, if not noticed, would result in a manifest miscarriage of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[b]y seeking, albeit unsuccessfully, to exclude the evidence by filing a motion in limine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.