Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 800 F.2d 195 - Maggard v. Wyrick

Maggard v. Wyrick’s Empirical Analysis

800 F.2d 195 · 1986

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2011 · most notably State Ex Rel. Cavallaro v. Groose (1995), Dicken

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

2101986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Weaver v. Graham · Olim v. Wakinekona · Dobbert v. Florida · Sloan v. Hicks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When in its opinion there is reasonable probability that the prisoner can be released without detriment to the community or to himself, the board shall release on parole....”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When in its opinion there is reasonable probability that an inmate of a state correctional institution can be released without detriment to the community or to himself, the board may in its discretion release or parole such person....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Because you had been convicted of Murder Second Degree and Armed Criminal Action following the shooting of another individual, the Board believes that your release at this time would depreciate the seriousness of the offense committed and/or promote disrespect for the law. Therefore, the Board in its discretion has determined to go outside the guidelines and schedule for another personal hearing in June 1998.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.