Ross v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
800 F.2d 808 · 1986
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2015
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Lambert v. People of the State of California · Texaco, Inc. v. Short · Atkins v. Parker · North Laramie Land Co. v. Hoffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The procedures for protesting and appealing tax assessments are clearly set forth in [the Arkansas Code], and ... all persons are generally presumed to know the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burris“[a]ll persons are charged with knowledge of the provisions of statutes and must take note of the procedure adopted by them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.