United States v. Katakis’s Empirical Analysis
800 F.3d 1017 · 2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (§ 902 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (§ 802 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Bailey · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Bryan v. United States · United States v. Nevils
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to prove a violation of § 1519, the Government must show that the defendant (1) knowingly committed one of the enumerated acts in the statute, such as destroying or concealing; (2) towards 'any record, document, or tangible object'; (3) with the intent to obstruct an actual or contemplated investigation by the United States of a matter within its jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.