Cobert v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
800 F.3d 1340 · 2015
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Kewley v. Department of Health & Human Services · Mendenhall Cmi v. Cedarapids Inc · Texas American Oil Corporation v. United States Department of Energy · Gava v. United States · National Organization of Veterans' Advocates, Inc. v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) obtained without procedures required by law, rule, or regulation having been followed; or (3) unsupported by substantial evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Miller timely appealed her removal to the Board.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Miller v. Zinke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.