White v. Bukowski’s Empirical Analysis
800 F.3d 392 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Woodford v. Ngo · V. C O Churner · Correction Officer Porters v. Ronald Nussle · Perez v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections · Medina-Claudio v. Rodríguez-Mateo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]risoners are required to exhaust grievance procedures they have been told about, but not procedures they have not been told about”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lanaghan v. Koch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.