Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 800 FSUPP 1239 - Toberman v. Copas

Toberman v. Copas’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
June 2008
most recently cited

5 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Pepsico, Inc. · Murray v. Reliance Insurance · Hanko v. United States · Barab v. Menford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A third-party complaint] must set forth a claim of secondary liability such that, if the third-party plaintiff is found liable, the third-party defendant will be liable to him/her under a theory of indemnification, contribution or some other theory of derivative liability recognized by the relevant substantive law. Any third-party complaint which does not facially meet this test is not proper under Rule 14 and thus falls outside of this Court’s ancillary jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.