800 F. Supp. 2d 897 - Cook v. Astrue’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Sims v. Apfel · Craft v. Astrue · Scott v. Barnhart · Briscoe ex rel. Taylor v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he ALJ may discount testimony regarding side effects of medication that are unsubstantiated by objective evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Taylor v. Berryhill
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.