Packer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2510 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2516 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Colonial Village, Inc. v. Spann · Yates v. Gober · City News & Novelty, Inc. v. City of WauKesha · United States v. Sababu · United States v. Amen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Interception means the intentional: (1) recording of; or (2) acquisition of the contents of; a telephonic communication by a person other than a sender or receiver of that communication, without the consent of the sender or receiver, by means of any instrument, device, or equipment under this article. This term includes the intentional recording of communication through the use of a computer or a FAX (facsimile transmission) machine.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Dommer v. Dommer · Edwards v. State“The Federal Wiretap Act authorizes federal and state law enforcement officers to intercept wire, oral, or electronic communications in criminal investigations pursuant to a properly issued court order administered in compliance with specific guidelines.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Steinberg v. State“The ordinary course of business exception to the Federal Wiretap Act's court order requirement applies to taped telephone conversations from a jail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Steinberg v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.