Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 800 SO2D 106 - State v. Burns

State v. Burns’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 691 So. 2d 347 - State v. Bosley · State v. Trosclair · 454 So. 2d 119 - State v. Fuller · 356 So. 2d 396 - State v. Cass

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]s noted by the supreme court in State v. Cass, supra at 397 , `[t]he right of the accused to have a juror selected by him try the case is a substantial one, the improper deprivation of which is prejudicial. The doctrine of harmless error is, therefore, inapplicable. (Citations omitted).'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.