Chambers v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 481 So. 2d 203 - Fisher v. State · 705 So. 2d 307 - Holland v. State · 660 So. 2d 1285 - Gossett v. State · 691 So. 2d 918 - Collins v. State · 612 So. 2d 359 - Century 21 Deep South Prop., Ltd. v. Corson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We agree that the testimony presented evidence of Chambers’[s] state of mind or motive for the shooting and not of prior bad acts. Chambers and Ferguson were arguing and drinking when the shooting occurred[,] and the State elicited none of the prior bad acts evidence complained of by Chambers. We conclude that the admission of the evidence in this case was not unduly prejudicial to Chambers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.