Havard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 481 So. 2d 203 - Fisher v. State · 684 So. 2d 625 - Hunter v. State · Jackson v. State · 654 So. 2d 1122 - Terrain Enterprises, Inc. v. Mockbee · Alexander v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to those opinions or inferences which are (a) rationally based on the perception of the witness, (b) helpful to the clear understanding of the testimony or the determination of a fact in issue, and (c) not based on scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge within the scope of Rule 702.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State“Committing a misdemeanor traffic offense is negligence, but such negligence does not constitute a prima facie case of vehicular manslaughter if a death results. The negligence of speeding or of running a stop sign must still be shown, to have been the cause of the accident.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is not within the witness's expertise. However, the Havard court concluded: the only objection made was that the witness could not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.