Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 592 So. 2d 114 - Hansen v. State · 551 So. 2d 188 - Benson v. State · 665 So. 2d 852 - Eakes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“one who is the owner in possession of the premises . . . is presumed to be in constructive possession of the articles found in or on the property possessed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“constructive possession may be shown by establishing that the drug involved was subject due [sic] to [appellant's] dominion or control.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.