Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 800 So. 2d 1257 - Windham v. State

800 So. 2d 1257 - Windham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Nixon · Whalen v. Roe · Jaffee Special Administrator for Allen Deceased v. Redmond · United States v. Harper · 784 So. 2d 186 - Austin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is simply no recognized principle of law by which such recognized privileges as the attorney-client privilege, the priest-penitent privilege or the privilege against self-incrimination can be ignored and the evidence compelled despite the assertion of those privileges no matter the urgency of a criminal defendant's need for the protected information.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is the duty of the jury to consider all of the evidence, including matters presented that tend to impeach a witness's credibility, and then to decide what weight and worth to give to any particular witness's testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.