800 So. 2d 259 - Knowles v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Arizona v. Fulminante · O'NEAL v. McAninch · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 751 So. 2d 537 - Goodwin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here, as in this case, the primary issue is the defendant's premeditation, I can think of nothing more harmful than the presentation of evidence of premeditation from the defendant's psychologist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Knowles v. State“Do I, the judge, think that the error substantially influenced the jury's decision?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Knowles v. State“substantially influence the jury's verdict”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Knowles v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.