Mott v. Mott’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 696 So. 2d 697 - Rosen v. Rosen · Hutchinson v. Hutchinson · 686 So. 2d 762 - White v. White · 763 So. 2d 410 - Jacoby v. Jacoby · Bromante v. Bromante
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To the extent that on remand the trial court determines that certain fees and costs are not recoverable by Ms. Mott under the prevailing party provision of the marital settlement agreement, the trial court must then consider whether those fees and costs would be recoverable . . . under the other terms of the agreement or under section 61.16. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the trial court must base its determination upon the individual financial resources of the parties, not the financial assistance provided by family or friends”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.