800 So. 2d 546 - Culbert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. State · 556 So. 2d 1016 - Jefferson v. State · 790 So. 2d 773 - Conley v. State · 708 So. 2d 44 - Par Industries, Inc. v. Target Container Co. · 279 So. 2d 642 - Shelton v. Kindred
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Furthermore, where the trial court summarily dismisses the post-conviction relief claim, it does not have an obligation to render factual findings and `this Court will assume that the issue was decided consistent with the judgment and [these findings] will not be disturbed on appeal unless manifestly wrong or clearly erroneous.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Spencer v. State · Stewart v. State“If it plainly appears from the face of the motion, any annexed exhibits and the prior proceedings in the case that the movant is not entitled to any relief, the judge may make an order for its dismissal and cause the prisoner to be notified.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The reason the law encourages trial courts to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law pertains to the facilitation of the appellate process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.