Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

800 So. 2d 656

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 2, 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-11-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2007

1 state decisions

Relies on Light v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-11-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DAVIS, Judge.

¶1Merlán Davis appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Davis’s direct appeal is currently pending. Thus, the trial court was without jurisdiction to rule on Davis’s motion to correct illegal sentence. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a). A prematurely filed motion to correct illegal sentence should be dismissed by a trial court and may be refiled after the direct appeal is final. Phillibert v. State, 768 So.2d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). In the alternative, a trial court may stay the motion pending the resolution of the direct appeal. Id.Accordingly, we vacate the order of the trial court and remand with instructions either to dismiss Davis’s 3.800(a) motion without prejudice to his right to refile after his direct appeal is final or to stay the motion pending the outcome of the direct appeal.

¶2Reversed and remanded.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and GREEN, J., Concur.
/800/so2d/656 · .json · Public domain