Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

800 So. 2d 699

Schriefer v. Schriefer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 30, 2001

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-11-30

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2002

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-11-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HARRIS, J.

¶1This is a one issue appeal from a breakup of a two year marriage. That one issue is the reasonableness of the distribution of marital property. The distribution is both confusing and unequal and is unexplained by the judgment. We remand for the court to set forth the expenditures of marital funds by both parties (the court has listed various amounts of expenditures by the wife but we cannot determine whether such expenditures overlap or are distinct) and explain how such expenditures, if they do, justify the considerably greater distribution to the husband or, if the disparity is not due to such expenditures, advise us what the justification is. See section 61.075(8)(d), Fla. Stat.

¶2REVERSED and REMANDED.

PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.
/800/so2d/699 · .json · Public domain