Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 800 So. 2d 710 - Farley v. Farley

800 So. 2d 710 - Farley v. Farley’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 625 So. 2d 1320 - Miller v. Miller · Rausch v. Rausch · McHome v. State · 362 So. 2d 58 - Lutgert v. Lutgert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “for entry of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage containing the required statutory findings to support the award of alimony and which addresses the tax implications of the alimony award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Failure to include findings of fact as required by section 61.08 is reversible error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.