Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 800 SO2D 747 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burks v. United States · Tibbs v. Florida · 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 397 So. 2d 1120 - Tibbs v. State · 458 So. 2d 269 - Florida Bar v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by granting a new trial where the evidence is technically sufficient to prove the criminal charge but the weight of the evidence does not appear to support the jury verdict. Moore, 800 So.2d at 749 . Thus, this rule”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “enables the trial judge to weigh the evidence and to determine the credibility of witnesses so as to act, in effect, as an additional juror.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “contrary to ... the weight of the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.